On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 05:49:30PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> Anyhow, there have been a number of people with opinions about the way
> shared libraries were produce with OpenSSL through the configuration
> option "shared". I'd like primarly those people, but also anyone
> who'd like to do so, to grab the next snapshot (it'll be produced in
> about 2� hours from the time of writing) and test this, both
> build and install. I recommend installing in a private directory, so
> you don't happen to disturb the rest of the system:
BTW, what should the $shared_extension field be? Should it be the
shared library extension without the version number or with? If it's
with, then under HP-UX, SHARED_LIBS_LINK_EXTS gets the '.so.[blah]'
while HP-UX has shared libraries with extension '.sl'. And, if it's
without, how do shared libraries under HP-UX get the version number
tacked on to the name?
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
