From: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> martin> I am responsible for the packaging of openssl for Debian martin> Linux. Now we have some problems with the license issues. martin> You point out good enough that some of the algorythms in the martin> package have copyright or license issues. You mean patenting issues, or? Without that, copyright and licensing isn't an issue unless exact copies of copyrighted or licensed source has been put into OpenSSL, and as far as I know that hasn't been done. Patenting and licensing/copyright are two different things and should not be mixed up. martin> With the Debian policy it is not allowed to include nonfree martin> software. nonfree software has to go into the nonfree martin> section. martin> We could build a version which lacks the problematic parts, martin> but then again the sources must be free of this code too. But martin> this would mean to change the original upstream source package martin> which is agains the Debian policy to include the original martin> sources and patches. An idea: Produce the binary packages 'openssl' and 'openssl-nonfree', and have the source package in the non-free section. You could point out that the 'openssl' package has been produced by configuring the openssl source to avoid some named algorithms Is that a solution that you guys can work with? To do that kind of sectioning in the source tree demands a certain amount of effort and time. It may happen in a while, but that won't be a very rapid process... -- Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Adrian Bunk: Bug#65368: libssl09 must go to non-US/non-free]
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Mon, 23 Oct 2000 03:50:41 -0700
- [Adrian Bunk: Bug#65368: libssl09 must go to... Christoph Martin
- Re: [Adrian Bunk: Bug#65368: libssl09 m... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: [Adrian Bunk: Bug#65368: libssl09 m... Rich Salz
- Re: [Adrian Bunk: Bug#65368: libssl09 m... Paul D. Smith
- Re: [Adrian Bunk: Bug#65368: libssl09 m... Rich Salz
- Re: [Adrian Bunk: Bug#65368: libssl... Paul D. Smith
- Re: [Adrian Bunk: Bug#65368: libssl09 m... Bob Beck
- Re: [Adrian Bunk: Bug#65368: libssl... Christoph Martin
