From: Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

ben> This is why I said what we have is really a mutable, but you can't say
ben> that in C (its a C++ concept). But the central point is that having
ben> "const" in an API is a promise not to modify the parameter - its
ben> completely pointless to make that promise and then break it!
ben> Furthermore, doing so will (potentially) result in incorrect code being
ben> generated by the compiler. I simply don't see why it is elegant to claim
ben> that something is const when it is not!!

What is your suggestion we do?  (I think I've asked for suggestions a
number of times now, and even laid out the alternatives as I saw them)

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to