From: Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jaltman> > Does it get better if you change all occurences of "(-t-c)" to "(0-t-c)"? jaltman> jaltman> That is what I did to make the warnings go away. But I'm not jaltman> confident as to the lack of overflow or underflow or .... jaltman> since we are computing a signed value and storing it back to jaltman> an unsigned value Not a problem, the values are supposed to wrap around, which they will do correctly on any 2-complement machine. The lines following are there to detect the possible carry bit (which is also the overflow). -- Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: warnings as errors crypto/bn/bn_mul.c 1.15
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Tue, 21 Nov 2000 07:14:45 -0800
- warnings as errors crypto/bn/bn_mul.c 1.15 Jeffrey Altman
- Re: warnings as errors crypto/bn/bn_mul... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: warnings as errors crypto/bn/bn_mul... Jeffrey Altman
- Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
