Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
>
> I would actually be quite positive to autoconf if it wasn't for two
> things in it that I view as flaws:
>
> 1) really heavy (to the level of magic) on sh features, making it
> really difficult to deal with when something goes wrong, and
> making portability a royal pain.
That's been my experience too. If it works its great. If it doesn't work
then I'd generally throw the package away and try something else.
I wouldn't like to try to get it going under Windows or some of the
weirder embedded platforms OpenSSL has been used with.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior crypto engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Core developer of the OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: via homepage.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
