Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/bn bn_mul.c bn_lcl.h

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

From: Ulf Möller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

ulf> On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 06:12:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ulf> 
ulf> >   I haven't yet changed the comments that describe bn_mul_recursive()
ulf> >   and bn_mul_part_recursive().
ulf> 
ulf> Don't forget the bn_internal manpage, please.

Ah, thanks for the reminder.

ulf> >    void bn_mul_recursive(BN_ULONG *r, BN_ULONG *a, BN_ULONG *b, int n2,
ulf> >   -           BN_ULONG *t)
ulf> >   +      int dna, int dnb, BN_ULONG *t)
ulf> 
ulf> So, what's the difference between bn_mul_recursive and
ulf> bn_mul_part_recursive now?

I'm pondering that, actually, and it may be that I'll merge the two,
'cause as you say, semantically there seems to be no difference any
more...

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]