From: Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lutz.Jaenicke> Is there any particular reason to not just call Lutz.Jaenicke> SSL_library_init()? I vaguely remember a discussion Lutz.Jaenicke> about shared library compatibility and Lutz.Jaenicke> macros... SSL_library_init() is the symbol referenced Lutz.Jaenicke> in the library. As long as macros remain macros and functions remain functions, the problem is NIL. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
