From: "John Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> john> 2. a fix to stop shared library flags being used when shared libraries john> are not built. A few collegues and I found that to be quite dangerous. Suppose someone wants to use OpenSSL as part of another shared library. You'll end up with a shared library where parts are relocatable and parts are not. That's extremely bad. I do not recall if that was the reason I treat the shared library configuration data the way I do, or if it was just luck it got that way... -- Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openssl-0.9.6 - fixes for shared libraries; UnixWare 7
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Fri, 26 Jan 2001 07:48:44 -0800
- openssl-0.9.6 - fixes for shared libraries; ... John Hughes
- RE: openssl-0.9.6 - fixes for shared li... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- RE: openssl-0.9.6 - fixes for share... John Hughes
