From: Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ben> You mean binary compatibility, which we are well known not to have? True, but there have been maniacs out there building shared libraries anyway, and I suspect Eric kept the function around for binary compatibility. I can see no other reason why he would undefine the macro and have that function there. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/des set_key.c
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Mon, 05 Feb 2001 14:52:39 -0800
- Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/des set_key.c Ulf Moeller
- Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/des set_... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/des set_... Ben Laurie
- Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/des set_... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/des set_... Ben Laurie
- Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/des set_... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/des ... Ben Laurie