Hoyt has an announcement list where he posts X509 drafts, defect reports
and resolutions, etc. Here's the most recent one. Any reason not to
ask him to post these here, as well?
/r$
> Hello
>
> I have posted some defect reports on the server. Three of these (DRs 272, 273, and
>274) are revisions of proposed defect resolutions that I posted in late November of
>last year. There was a substantial amount of comment. These revised texts should
>address those comments.
>
> In addition I have posted DRs 275 - 277. The subject of the DRs are
>
> DR 272 - Certification path length
> DR 273 - Name constraints
> DR 274 - Attribute certificate version
> DR 275 - Extended key usage
> DR 276 - Any policy in self-issued certificates
> DR 277 - Requires explicit policy skip certs value
>
> The DRs can be found at
>
>
>ftp://ftp.bull.com/pub/OSIdirectory/DefectResolution/DefectReports/X.509andRelated/DR_272Rev1.pdf
>
>
>ftp://ftp.bull.com/pub/OSIdirectory/DefectResolution/DefectReports/X.509andRelated/DR_273Rev1.pdf
>
>
>ftp://ftp.bull.com/pub/OSIdirectory/DefectResolution/DefectReports/X.509andRelated/DR_274Rev2.pdf
>
>
>ftp://ftp.bull.com/pub/OSIdirectory/DefectResolution/DefectReports/X.509andRelated/DR_275.pdf
>
>
>ftp://ftp.bull.com/pub/OSIdirectory/DefectResolution/DefectReports/X.509andRelated/DR_276.pdf
>
>
>ftp://ftp.bull.com/pub/OSIdirectory/DefectResolution/DefectReports/X.509andRelated/DR_277.pdf
>
> We plan to submit these solutions, within the next two weeks, for formal voting in
>ISO. Therefore if there are any concerns about the proposed solutions, please let us
>know as soon as possible so any necessary modifications can be made before submitting
>to ballot.
>
> On the issue of name constraints, we would like to thank the PKIX profile editors
>and contributors for all the effort they gave between the last PKIX meeting and the
>X.509 meeting in Geneva in late January. That effort ensured that we arrived at a
>single solution that satisfies the combined requirements that have arisen in both
>groups. This solution was reviewed during the meeting meeting in Geneva and has the
>support of those present at that meeting.
>
> We have also approved Technical Corrigenda to both the 3rd and 4th editions. They
>can be found at
>
>
>ftp://ftp.bull.com/pub/OSIdirectory/DefectResolution/TechnicalCorrigenda/ApprovedTechnicalCorrigendaToX.509/TC1toX.509%7C8-4thEdition.pdf
>
>
>ftp://ftp.bull.com/pub/OSIdirectory/DefectResolution/TechnicalCorrigenda/ApprovedTechnicalCorrigendaToX.509/TC9toX.509%7C8-3rdEdition.pdf
>
> The TC to the 4th edition will be incorporated into the 4th edition. ITU has not
>been able to published the document as originally scheduled but I expect they will
>have it out in the next few months. In the interim we will publish yet another
>"final" version of X.509 on the server within the next few weeks. It will be
>announced to these lists when it is available.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
