From: Ulf Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ulf> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ulf>
ulf> > Add news section for OpenSSL 0.9.6a. Please add what's missing
ulf>
ulf> Should we mention the SSL_peek fix, and the disabled Alpha assembler code?
The disabled Alpha assembler code should probably be mentioned as part
of the line talking about bug fixes fro certain architectures. About
SSL_peek(), there's the line telling about bug fixes to SSL routines
among others. If people want to see the details, they'll just have to
read CHANGES...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
