Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
> Apparently, in the change from 0.9.6 to 0.9.7 the definitions of
>
> GEN_OTHERNAME, GEN_EMAIL, GEN_DNS, ...
>
> went from
>
> (X | V_ASN1_CONTEXT_SPECIFIC)
>
> to
>
> (X)
>
> This of course breaks dynamic linked applications. Is there a good
> reason for changing the values of these constants?
>
This is the new ASN1 code, the reason is mentioned in README.ASN1 .
There are quite a few other places where it has been necessary to break
binary compatibility.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior crypto engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Core developer of the OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: via homepage.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
