> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Laurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 6:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Rijndael patch
> But that aside, if you can get a major win for some
> particular platform
> but only at the expense of other platforms, then the correct answer,
> imo, is two versions.
OK, I'm sorry, the platform question was really just a diversion.
What I'm talking about (32-bit implementations of Rijndael ECB,
CBC, OFB, and CFB with byte-oriented support for unaligned data)
is really a win for all platforms supported by OpenSSL.
My question is, if I do the work to implement the above and do
so correctly, will it be accepted by the development team?
I admire this group's critical eye, but it would be nice
to hear some response to compromise.
-Andy
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
