Bodo Moeller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:47:13PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Index: des.h
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/crypto/des/des.h,v
> > retrieving revision 1.32
> > retrieving revision 1.33
> > diff -u -r1.32 -r1.33
> > --- des.h 2001/05/13 04:40:42 1.32
> > +++ des.h 2001/07/30 17:46:13 1.33
> > @@ -84,16 +84,20 @@
> > /* With "const", gcc 2.8.1 on Solaris thinks that des_cblock *
> > * and const_des_cblock * are incompatible pointer types. */
> >
> > -typedef struct des_ks_struct
> > +typedef struct des_ks
> > + {
> > + union
> > {
> > - union {
> > - des_cblock cblock;
> > - /* make sure things are correct size on machines with
> > - * 8 byte longs */
> > - DES_LONG deslong[2];
> > - } ks;
> > - int weak_key;
> > - } des_key_schedule[16];
> > + des_cblock cblock;
> > + /* make sure things are correct size on machines with
> > + * 8 byte longs */
> > + DES_LONG deslong[2];
> > + } ks[16];
> > +#if OPENBSD_DEV_CRYPTO
> > + struct session_op *session;
> > + unsigned char key[8];
> > +#endif
> > + } des_key_schedule;
>
> Surely this deserves an entry in 'CHANGES'?
It got one, when I committed from the right directory! The OPENBSD thing
should go away, though. Good grief, dunno what came over me yesterday!
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]