Bodo Moeller wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:47:13PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >   Index: des.h
> >   ===================================================================
> >   RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/crypto/des/des.h,v
> >   retrieving revision 1.32
> >   retrieving revision 1.33
> >   diff -u -r1.32 -r1.33
> >   --- des.h   2001/05/13 04:40:42     1.32
> >   +++ des.h   2001/07/30 17:46:13     1.33
> >   @@ -84,16 +84,20 @@
> >    /* With "const", gcc 2.8.1 on Solaris thinks that des_cblock *
> >     * and const_des_cblock * are incompatible pointer types. */
> >
> >   -typedef struct des_ks_struct
> >   +typedef struct des_ks
> >   +    {
> >   +    union
> >       {
> >   -   union   {
> >   -           des_cblock cblock;
> >   -           /* make sure things are correct size on machines with
> >   -            * 8 byte longs */
> >   -           DES_LONG deslong[2];
> >   -           } ks;
> >   -   int weak_key;
> >   -   } des_key_schedule[16];
> >   +   des_cblock cblock;
> >   +   /* make sure things are correct size on machines with
> >   +    * 8 byte longs */
> >   +   DES_LONG deslong[2];
> >   +   } ks[16];
> >   +#if OPENBSD_DEV_CRYPTO
> >   +    struct session_op *session;
> >   +    unsigned char key[8];
> >   +#endif
> >   +    } des_key_schedule;
> 
> Surely this deserves an entry in 'CHANGES'?

It got one, when I committed from the right directory! The OPENBSD thing
should go away, though. Good grief, dunno what came over me yesterday!

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to