Doug Kaufman wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 06:31:56PM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> > > Why are you setting this limit for MSDOS? You certainly don't need it
> > > for the DJGPP port. Is the limit specific to certain compilers?
I just copied the same #ifdef from the ssl3_get_client_certificate
so it would have the same behavior.
> >
> > I don't know. This construction is in since the OpenSSL team took over
> > from EAY...
> >
> > I'll add it to the TODO list. If we change this to a dynamic limit,
> > we could start with 16kB (platform independant) and then applications
A dynamic limit sounds good, that would solve our problem, thanks!
>
> This actually brings up a question that I have been wondering about.
> Is there a MSDOS compiler under which openssl builds other than DJGPP?
> If so, which one and what applications have been built under it with
> openssl? The patch I previously submitted for compiling under DJGPP
> mostly got around the problem that the build procedure assumes that
> the operating system can make use of symbolic links, which MSDOS
> cannot. There is also an assumption that the system can run shell
> scripts. DJGPP does this under a port of bash. How do other MSDOS
> compilers handle this?
> Doug
> __
> Doug Kaufman
> Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
(630) 252-5444
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
