Ryan Hurst wrote:
>
> Granted; guess I should not have given such high praise to the
> quality/uniqueness of that this device produces since they do not provide
> information on its design nor state that it has been evaluated by any
> qualified independent reviewers. My assumption was and I guess still (to
> some degree) that the quality of input material available in a hardware
> based implementation is far superior to what is available to a software
> implementation (like egd.pl, etc.) At a minimum this driver/hardware
> essentially gives windows users a /dev/urandom which they have been missing.
Except that there's no evidence it is random at all.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
