Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> --- enginetest.c 2001/09/10 14:10:10 1.10
>> +++ enginetest.c 2001/09/10 17:46:54 1.11
>> @@ -234,8 +234,8 @@
>> }
>> for(loop = 0; loop < 512; loop++)
>> {
>> - OPENSSL_free(ENGINE_get_id(block[loop]));
>> - OPENSSL_free(ENGINE_get_name(block[loop]));
>> + OPENSSL_free((void *)ENGINE_get_id(block[loop]));
>> + OPENSSL_free((void *)ENGINE_get_name(block[loop]));
> but but... this is an abuse of constness!
Well, it's legal C -- we know that the pointers returned by those
functions are the pointers we originally created const-less and handed
over to the corresponding ENGINE_set_... functions, so it's OK to
cast the 'const' away.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
