Dr S N Henson wrote:
> I noticed these when I was attempting a different patch. I think the fix
> I've done is functionally equivalent to your patch, except it doesn't
> delete the email_dn option from do_subject() which I'll commit
> separately.
Thanks.
> Also I've deleted emailAddress from the DN in a different way: dup the
> name then delete and emailAddress entries, this should retain the
> X509_NAME structure in the event of multi values AVAs being used.
I was thinking of changing the patch to match that behaviour too :-D
Thanks again...
Did you had the chance of reading my comments in the email "OpenSSL and
Patches for CAs" ? What do you think about it ?
--
C'you,
Massimiliano Pala
--o-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Massimiliano Pala [OpenCA Project Manager] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.openca.org Tel.: +39 (0)59 270 094
http://openca.sourceforge.net Mobile: +39 (0)347 7222 365
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
