On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > No, you're not wrong. However, I wonder when I ever said that > suggestions or improvements would be discouraged? What I tried to > communicate was that since shared library support is experimental, > shared libraries shouldn't be used in serious production, if nothing
Of course, but if it is not tried at all, then chances it'll get production stability get lower, or at least the point is getting away in the future. Actually, in the case of shared libraries vs traditional ar archives, there is nothing that can get broken once linking is done properly -- the dynamic linking is transparent to programs. > else then because the support isn't really there yet. Contributions > that bring us closer to a level that we feel we can support are very > much welcome! Ah sure, OK. What about the C optimization flags patch, I've sent beside the two you've already commented? Maciej -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP key available + ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
