From: Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ben> The proximate cause is that fails the padding check (in fact, appears to
ben> not be padded at all). Tricky to say more than that - but it'd be
ben> interesting to compare the numbers in RSA_eay_public_decrypt() for the
ben> two runs.
OK, something is way wrong. In RSA_padding_check_PKCS1_type_1, after
the look that walks past all the 0xff, the following values just can't
be right:
i: 219
j: 254
That's a *lot* of padding... I'll see what happens if I recompile
without the BN assembler routines...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
