From: Dr S N Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
stephen.henson> While this is what is done with other ciphers I'd
stephen.henson> argue that it isn't strictly speaking correct. The NID
stephen.henson> is tied to an ASN1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER (OID). The OID
stephen.henson> (at least for CFB mode) doesn't represent the number
stephen.henson> of feedback bits just the cipher+mode combination.
I agree. What I did was just the quick thing to bring uniformity to
what has been done so far. I suggest that deeper changes be done in
the main trunk only.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
