> > I tried this on the March 5 snapshot with both the vendor bc (which is > > an older GNU bc by the look of things) and GNU bc 1.06. They show > > identical failures (with different numbers than the February 13 > > snapshot) in BN_mod_mul. Output from 'bc <test/tmp.bntest' for both > > vendor bc and GNU bc 1.06 on an Irix 6.5 64-bit platform is attached. > > To get an idea *what* is going wrong, we need the actual file > tmp.bntest. The bc output just shows *that* something is going wrong. > > But we already know that currently there are bugs for 64-bit > platforms. The problems with the 32-bit system are more interesting; > for that case, please also try a 'no-asm' build.
Okay, got it. I've sent to Bodo the tmp.bntest files (modified to print the options &c. from 'make report' so it's clear which is which) for the 20020306 snapshot on a 32-bit Irix 6.5 system both with and without no-asm (they do appear to produce different results), using gcc. I've also provided tmp.bntest for similar builds on 64-bit Irix. Since the files themselves are too large to send to the mailing list, the tmp.bntest files are available as irix32.gz, etc.) at http://www.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/~moeller/dwhitesi/ --Dawn ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
