On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:25:00AM +0200, Michael Bell wrote:
> after I found the wrong definitions of SN_surname and SN_serialNumber I
> looked around and find the next problems in crypto/objects/ :
>
> SN_title "title" (now "T")
> SN_description "description" (now "D")
> SN_givenName "gn" (now "G")
> SN_initials "initials" (now "I")
> LN_uniqueIdentifier "x500UniqueIdentifier" (now "uniqueIdentifier")
> SN_rfc822Mailbox "mail" (now "rfc822Mailbox")
> SN_pkcs9_emailAddress "emailAddress" (now "Email")
>
> * SN_rfc822Mailbox is not wrong but a short name exists
> * I don't find a short name for SN_pkcs9_emailAddress. The related RFC
> only defines a long name
>
> Is it necessary to check all defines because of the many errors or are
> only common attributes affected (and now fixed)?
To be fair: I never touched this thing before and I am not too familiar
with these RFCs. But obviously nobody else of the team picked up the topic
(yet). I can promise you to add your email to my TODO list, but I cannot
promise you a time until when I will find the time to dig into this
issue...
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
