On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:40:56AM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> > > On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh and, btw., current Cygwin is 1.3.10, 1.3.11 coming soon. Why are
> > > > you testing with a version which is almost a year old?
> > Does it work now without your patches?
> ...
> I haven't yet tested 0.9.6d-beta1 without the patch under Cygwin.
I just finished testing 0.9.6d-beta1 under Cygwin without my patch
applied. It compiles without problem and "make test" shows no errors.
It seems the only problem I find with the Cygwin compile is with
the snapshot of 0.9.7 (and that is fixed by my patch for 0.9.7).
0.9.6d-beta1 was compiled with GCC 2.95.3-4, Cygwin 1.3.10-1,
bash 2.05a-3, and binutils 20011002-1.
Doug
__
Doug Kaufman
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
