DL>> I'm not on the dev team or anything, but I don't understand how you could have
*ever* successfully encrypted multiple streams with the same EVP context??? Just the
IV's alone would have been
DL>> screwed up for CBC ciphers and stream ciphers like RC4 would completely break.
PT> ECB won't - IV isn't needed there... I didn't say its a complete solution. Still
it doesnt
PT> break nothing as far as I can tell. More changes has to come of
PT> course... Still what exactly this patch does is:
PT> I EVP_UpdateEncrypt is called EVP_EncryptFinal intermidiate data in
+-> If +-> after
PT> the temporary buf in the context wont be considered a part of the new
PT> data stream.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
