On Thu, May 09, 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:

> 
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Apr 25 16:16:02 2002]:
> 
> > Is this the expected behaviour ? Either way one must be fixed :)
> > Btw EVP_OpenFinal does exactly what EVP_SealFinal does and adds to
> > this the return value...
> 
> Hmm, I think Steve should answer this one.  Personally, I think this 
> shows a certain inconsistency in the EVP, I see quite a lot of 
> variantion in return types depending on which EVP_*Init, EVP_*Update 
> and EVP_*Final you look at...
> 

Its an omission. It should have been updated when various EVP_*Init
functions were updated to return values.

I'll have a look at it.

Steve.
--
Dr. Stephen Henson      [EMAIL PROTECTED]            
OpenSSL Project         http://www.openssl.org/~steve/
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to