In message <1023267032.28480.18.camel@woodstock> on 05 Jun 2002 10:50:31 +0200, 
Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

martin> Am Mit, 2002-06-05 um 08.12 schrieb Richard Levitte via RT:
martin> > 
martin> > BN_pseudo_rand_range() was given in the synopsis exactly as you 
martin> > requested, since 0.9.6c (or at least, that's what I can make out by 
martin> > checking with our repository).  I must say that I have some difficulty 
martin> > doing anything with this report because of that...
martin> 
martin> I had to apply the following patch for 0.9.6d:
martin> 
martin> --- openssl-0.9.6d.orig/doc/crypto/BN_rand.pod
martin> +++ openssl-0.9.6d/doc/crypto/BN_rand.pod
martin> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
martin>  
martin>   int BN_rand_range(BIGNUM *rnd, BIGNUM *range);
martin>  
martin> - int BN_pseudo_rand_range(BIGNUM *rnd, int bits, int top, int bottom);
martin> + int BN_pseudo_rand_range(BIGNUM *rnd, BIGNUM *range);
martin>  
martin>  =head1 DESCRIPTION

D'oh!  I looked in bn.pod.  Silly me...

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to