> So the entries you supplied are for gcc (hppa64-hp-hpux11.00)?
> Is there a way for "config" to find out itself? Please have a look
> into "config" and search for GCC_ARCH to see what I mean.

Sure.  It will take me a couple of days.  In GCC 3.1 gcc --version
doesn't work the same way so I will looking at gcc -v | egrep "^gcc
version"
to do the same job.

It may be best to compile a program like the following ...

#include <stdio.h>

int main()
{
  printf("%d.%d.%d\n", __GNUC__, __GNUC_MINOR__, __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__);
  return 0;
}

This way you have complete control over the format.

Cheers,

Ross

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ross Alexander                           "He knows no more about his
MIS - NEC Europe Limited            destiny than a tea leaf knows
Work ph: +44 20 8752 3394         the history of East India Company"


|---------+--------------------------------->
|         |           Lutz Jaenicke         |
|         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|         |           Cottbus.DE>           |
|         |           Sent by:              |
|         |           owner-openssl-dev@open|
|         |           ssl.org               |
|         |                                 |
|         |                                 |
|         |           10/06/2002 15:14      |
|         |           Please respond to     |
|         |           openssl-dev           |
|         |                                 |
|---------+--------------------------------->
  
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                    
                         |
  |       To:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                            
                         |
  |       cc:                                                                          
                         |
  |       Subject:  Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1                     
                         |
  
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 03:06:22PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I think the problem is because 32bit HP uses the SOM object format
> and 64bit HP uses ELF.  These are quite different and hence gcc
> cannot be configured for both targets.  So when you build gcc it is
> a different target (hppa64-hp-hpux11.00) for 64bit than 32bit
> (hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00).  NB On PA-linux this is different,  its
> uses ELF32 and ELF64 respectively, so I think a single instance
> of gcc does have 32/64 bit flag.

So the entries you supplied are for gcc (hppa64-hp-hpux11.00)?
Is there a way for "config" to find out itself? Please have a look
into "config" and search for GCC_ARCH to see what I mean.

Best regards,
             Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]





______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to