Note that Apple delivers OpenSSL 0.9.6b, so it may be that the differences are few enough not to trigger much problems, apparently with RC4 being the great exception. Actually, even this shouldn't be a problem, if it weren't for some binary incompatibilities between (I think) 0.9.6c and 0.9.6d...
I just tested OpenSSL 0.9.8-dev on MacOSX 5.5 with the delivered libcrypto.dylib and libssl.dylib removed, and it had no trouble at all. I'm about to test 0.9.6e-dev (which doesn't differ from 0.9.6d at all when it comes to RC4). I assume we're still talking about 0.9.6d, right? [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jul 16 06:09:37 2002]: > At 7:55 AM -0700 15/7/02, Doug Kaufman wrote: > >I don't have a Mac, but I took the liberty of forwarding the trouble > >report to Chris Roberts, who compiles and packages openssl for the > >OSXGNU project. I am appending the reply. Does adding the linker > >option "-flatnamespace" fix the problem for those with Macs? > > It doesn't appear to be a linking problem since all the other tests > are successful (even when you use "make -k test" to get past the rc4 > test) which I would expect would have failed if it was a linking > problem. Therefore I suspect it is something in the code for RC4 > function. > > Mark. > -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
