Argh, you are right. When I tried to verify the problem. I only testet the 0.9.6g binary but had the 0.9.6c libraries installed. So I assume, the submitter of the bug made a similar mistake.
Sorry, to bug you. Christoph Am Don, 2002-09-19 um 15.23 schrieb Lutz Jaenicke via RT: > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Sep 19 12:11:15 2002]: > > ljaenicke@lutz:~$ dpkg -l openssl > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name Version Description > +++-==============-==============-============================================ > ii openssl 0.9.6e-1 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary and > related > ljaenicke@lutz:~$ which openssl > /usr/bin/openssl > ljaenicke@lutz:~$ /usr/bin/openssl version > OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > ljaenicke@lutz:~/newsoft/multiplexer$ ls -al /usr/lib/libcrypto.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Aug 28 11:42 > /usr/lib/libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.0.9.6 > ljaenicke@lutz:~/newsoft/multiplexer$ ls -al /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 744164 Jul 30 18:50 > /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6 > ljaenicke@lutz:~/newsoft/multiplexer$ strings usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6 > | grep 0.9.6 > libcrypto.so.0.9.6 > OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > MD2 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > MD4 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > MD5 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > SHA part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > SHA1 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > RIPE-MD160 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > libdes part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > DES part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > RC2 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > RC4 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > Blowfish part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > CAST part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > Big Number part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > RSA part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > DSA part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > Diffie-Hellman part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > Stack part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > lhash part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > RAND part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > EVP part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > ASN.1 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > PEM part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > X.509 part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > CONF part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > CONF_def part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > TXT_DB part of OpenSSL 0.9.6e 30 Jul 2002 > > So I cannot reproduce the bug reported... > > Best regards,
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
