In message <000a01c276a6$d5bda720$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:04:02
-0400, "Chris Brook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
cbrook> Is this now fixed for EVP_Encrypt() and EVP_Decrypt() or only the
cbrook> xxInit,xxUpdate,xxFinal sequences? Or must I set padding off?
cbrook> If this is resolved, I can go back and rerun the NIST AES certification
cbrook> tests for CFB with 8 bit block sizes. Needless to say they failed before.
It should work for all functions. The functions themselves were
perfectly correct, it was just the info in the CFB and OFB for all
algorithms that had an incorrect block size (the underlying cipher
blocksize instead of 1).
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
