In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:10:18 +0200 (MET DST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The smart thing would probably to have macros representing the number. X509VERSION1, X509VERSINO2 and X509VERSION3? steve> steve 21-Oct-2002 02:10:15 steve> steve> Modified: demos/x509 mkcert.c steve> Log: steve> Typo: v3 is represented by 2. steve> steve> Revision Changes Path steve> 1.2 +1 -1 openssl/demos/x509/mkcert.c steve> steve> Index: mkcert.c steve> =================================================================== steve> RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/demos/x509/mkcert.c,v steve> retrieving revision 1.1 steve> retrieving revision 1.2 steve> diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 steve> --- mkcert.c 2001/09/12 00:19:20 1.1 steve> +++ mkcert.c 2002/10/21 00:10:10 1.2 steve> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ steve> } steve> rsa=NULL; steve> steve> - X509_set_version(x,3); steve> + X509_set_version(x,2); steve> ASN1_INTEGER_set(X509_get_serialNumber(x),serial); steve> X509_gmtime_adj(X509_get_notBefore(x),0); steve> X509_gmtime_adj(X509_get_notAfter(x),(long)60*60*24*days); ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
