In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:54:16 +0200,
Massimiliano Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
madwolf> I am planning to code it for the openssl-0.9.7-beta3 ( is it
madwolf> better working on latest openssl-0.9.7-stable SNAPs ? ).
Better go with a snap, there are a few small bugs in beta 3 that makes
it hard to compile.
madwolf> Also I'd like to know if it will be best to code this ENGINE
madwolf> as a dynamic one (external to the OpenSSL source tree) or it
madwolf> is best we start coding it directly into OpenSSL ?
If you look at one of the built-in engines, you'll see that they're
prepared to be compiled as individual shared libraries as well as
being built into libcrypto. The difference between the two modes is
very small and is controlled with the macro ENGINE_DYNAMIC_SUPPORT.
If you look in demos/engine/rsaref, you'll see another that's
currently only built as a shared library. It's basically up to you.
If you prefer to make it built into libcrypto by default, I would like
you to include support for having it built as a shared library.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
