In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:52:02
+0200 (METDST), "John Viega via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
As I commented for ticket 306, you probably want the behavior of CFB-8
and CFB-8. We haven't implemented that.
To make it easier to understand what you're talking about, it would be
good to use terms like CFB-8, i.e. where the block size (in bits) is
included in the identity.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
