In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 17 Oct
2002 16:19:23 -0400, John Viega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
viega> > viega> Also, why isn't counter mode implemented in a generic fashion?
viega> > It's
viega> > viega> so simple, it should be usable with any block cipher without
viega> > having to
viega> > viega> write additional code.
viega> >
viega> > Ask yourself why OFB, CFB, CBC and ECB modes aren't implemented
viega> > generically. A hint: speed. Someone made a test having a generic CBC
viega> > that would take a pointer to the cipher function to use. The speed
viega> > apparently decreased enough for it to be an issue.
viega>
viega> I mean have a generic implementation, not necessarily a generic
viega> interface. I was more thinking a counter mode macro that could be used
viega> to create counter mode instances for all block ciphers quickly.
That's something I've thought of just a few days ago. I'll add that
to my TODO.
viega> Additionally, if you were to create a COUNTER wrapper along the lines
viega> of the HMAC wrapper (clearly it'd need to be a bit different), you
viega> wouldn't need the indirection of a function pointer whatsoever, and
viega> would not need to explicitly instantiate macros.
All the HMAC stuff I see (quick look) call EVP functions. If the mode
functions did that, we'd see dramatic slowdown. Not a good thought.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
