This ticket is now resolved. [levitte - Fri Oct 11 10:18:21 2002]:
> This ticket appears to be resolvable, but to be safe, I'll ask: is > this still an issue? > > [guest - Fri Aug 16 11:04:41 2002]: > > > > Note that the solaris-sparcv9-cc and solaris-sparcv9-gcc > > configurations > > > actually use just sparcv8plus code (32 bit); see Configure. > > > > I did not know that, since I looked at config only, but not at > > Configure. But still: is it assured that every sun4u machine has > the > > sparcv8plus instruction set? If not, then the patch is still > required > > as the isalist manpage says: "Programs compiled for instruction > sets > > that do not appear in the list will most likely experience > perfomance > > degradation or not run at all on this machine." > > > > > Only the solari64-sparcv9-... configuration really needs sparcv9. > > > > > > This is on a sun4u machine with 32-bit OS only: > > > $ isalist > > > sparcv8plus+vis sparcv8plus sparcv8 sparcv8-fsmuld sparcv7 sparc > > > > > > solaris-sparcv9-cc or ...-gcc are the configurations that should > be > > used > > > on this machine. > > > > > > Do you have a sun4u machine on which the solaris-sparcv9-cc/gcc > code > > > actually fails? > > > > I compiled OpenSSL straightaway for sparv8 since I was scared by > the > > isalist manpage (s. above). > > > > > > > > > I agree. Please try the attached patch > > > > > > The patch should not be necessary (and should probably be > reverted > > in > > > the CVS). > -- Richard Levitte ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
