I thought that OPENSSL_SYSNAME_* was the new way of doing things, so I changed the Microsoft standard UNDER_CE to OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WINCE at the last minute. I think I had to pull in e_os.h in one of the files to make sure this was defined. I'll change it all back.
Whoops, last-minute late-night mistake. The file should be in util/pl, but it's the one in the root directory that is the correct one to use. I'll send a new patch later today. Steven -----Original Message----- From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 16 November 2002 6:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows CE support for 0.9.7 (against 20021114 snapshot) Thanks! Looks good for the most part, the only thing that's just "non-traditional" is the direct use of OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WINCE, but that's easily taken care of. Oh, yeah, is there any reason to keep VC-CE.pl (as opposed to util/pl/VC-CE.pl)? -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
