In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:48:55 +0100, Andy
Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
appro> Does the code have to be so obscure? Is it recognized that it's
appro> byte-order dependent? Is it intentional?
My bad, and unintentional. Please make it better. I was just worried
about possible data loss warnings when casting p to int or similar.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
