I don't understand what BN_div() expects from bn_div_words().  I see
calls like this:

bn_div_words(0xFFFFC383,0x838B4B53,0x80000000)

and I wonder what the hell is expected to come out of that.  The
result of dividing 0xFFFFC383838B4B53 with 0x80000000 is 0x1FFFF8707,
which can't be correctly represented in a BN_ULONG on a 32-bit system
(where BN_LLONG isn't defined)!

This just doesn't make sense...

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to