I don't understand what BN_div() expects from bn_div_words(). I see
calls like this:
bn_div_words(0xFFFFC383,0x838B4B53,0x80000000)
and I wonder what the hell is expected to come out of that. The
result of dividing 0xFFFFC383838B4B53 with 0x80000000 is 0x1FFFF8707,
which can't be correctly represented in a BN_ULONG on a 32-bit system
(where BN_LLONG isn't defined)!
This just doesn't make sense...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]