On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:30:42PM +0100, Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:
> Hi,
> after I've installed the beta4 version, I've checked if all files have
> been installed. and I see one has been renamed or withdrawn from the
> sources or whatever, isn't updated (e_os.h):
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root sys 7260 Nov 27 16:41 dh.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root sys 9153 Nov 27 16:41 dsa.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root sys 13871 Nov 27 16:41 dso.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root sys 14404 Nov 6 18:14 e_os.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root sys 9390 Nov 27 16:41 e_os2.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root sys 540 Nov 27 16:41 ebcdic.h
>
> The file e_os.h was installed by openssl-0.9.7-beta4=3. Is that expected
> behaviour? Should I delete e_os.h?
I am not completely sure that I understand your statement.
e_os.h is delivered with 0.9.7-beta4. It however is a "private" header
file, so "make install" should not install it.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
