On Mon, Dec 16, 2002, Richard Levitte wrote:
> Protect loading routines with a lock.
> PR: 373
>
> Summary:
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.33.2.4 +6 -1 openssl/ssl/ssl_ciph.c
> ____________________________________________________________________________
>
> Index: openssl/ssl/ssl_ciph.c
> ============================================================
> $ cvs diff -u -r1.33.2.3 -r1.33.2.4 ssl_ciph.c
> --- openssl/ssl/ssl_ciph.c 19 Jul 2002 19:53:02 -0000 1.33.2.3
> +++ openssl/ssl/ssl_ciph.c 16 Dec 2002 06:06:06 -0000 1.33.2.4
> @@ -751,7 +751,12 @@
> */
> if (rule_str == NULL) return(NULL);
>
> - if (init_ciphers) load_ciphers();
> + if (init_ciphers)
> + {
> + CRYPTO_w_lock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
> + if (init_ciphers) load_ciphers();
> + CRYPTO_w_unlock(CRYPTO_LOCK_SSL);
> + }
Just curious: why the nested "if (init_ciphers) .."?
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
