On 2002-12-18T12:03+0100, Andy Polyakov wrote: ) > I've put together an OpenSSL 0.9.6h package using GNU autoconf, available ) > from: ) > http://site.rpi-acm.org/info/openssl/ ) ) This is surely great, but I find it unfair/inappropriate that no ) information whatsoever is provided on [...]
Sorry about all of that. My main goal is to provide a packaged OpenSSL that honours the de facto standard "--prefix," "--exec-prefix," "--sysconfdir," etc. install adjustments common among autoconf'd packages. Additionally, while I haven't run into any problems myself, it is possible some sites might need to adjust the CC, which versions of dependency libraries are linked against, etc., which is also standardized by autoconf. I have put up an .autoconf3 at site.rpi-acm.org/info/openssl/ with the standard autoconf INSTALL file (which references "make check"), and an amended README. My purpose in contacting this list is to find developers interested in redoing the functionality of ./Configure in autoconf, and additionally to find people who are able to test the package on platforms I don't have access to (just the four unices listed on the page). -- Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> From Garance [@vcc], to ACM: - yeah, but if you're trying to cheer up JSF, all you need is the beer... naim FAQ: http://128.113.139.111/~n/naim/FAQ ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
