In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 26 Dec 2002 22:38:42
+0100 (MET), "Andy Polyakov via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> Richard! How come this ticket made to 0.9.[78] STATUS? The question was
rt> originally about 0.9.6h[-engine] and the issue is not relevant in
rt> 0.9.[78] context.
Because I make mistakes sometimes. Thanks for telling me, I just
removed that line. It's possible it was prompted by my very recent
experience with failures of BN_sqr() tests because of bugs in
vms.mar...
rt> As for 0.9.6. There're two ways to solve this problem:
rt>
rt> - ./Configure solaris-sparcv9-gcc -m32
rt> - ./Configure solaris64-sparcv9-gcc
rt>
rt> The question is what do we do to resolve this ticket? I see two options:
rt>
rt> - complement FAQ with 0.9.6 specific clause;
rt> - backport relevant ./config and ./Configure code;
I suggest extending the FAQ.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
