In message <015701c2b1a4$1dcef310$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:43:14 +0100, "Gisle Vanem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
giva> "Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
giva>
giva> > levitte> Please name it. The reason that I ask you is that the changes you
giva> > levitte> propose are already present in 0.9.7 and 0.9.8-dev.
giva> >
giva> > Or is your patch a reverse patch?
giva>
giva> No, not a reverse patch. The snapshot I diff'ed against was
giva> openssl-SNAP-20021229.tar.gz. Is there another snapshot
giva> branch?
OK, this is very odd. Can you check against the two attached
archives? In those files, it looks like the result of your proposed
patch.
The two archives are from the main trunk (openssl-0.9.8-dev.tar) and
the 0.9.7 branch (openssl-0.9.7a-dev.tar).
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
openssl-0.9.8-dev.tar
Description: Binary data
openssl-0.9.7a-dev.tar
Description: Binary data
