On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:26:41PM +0100, Massimiliano Pala via RT wrote:
> forgive my ignorance but I am not at ease with your methods. You assigned
> me this number but what about your impression about the SCEP support
> integrated into OpenSSL ?
The ticket number was automatically assigned by the request tracker.
Unfortunately nobody of the team yet took the time to look into your
proposal.
I am not familiar with SCEP (yet), however would consider it a worthful
addition to the OpenSSL toolkit.
> I hope you are for it, but am not sure what I have to do now. Do I have
> to do all the integration work by myself and post it as a patch against
> the 0.9.7 or can we discuss of the work (i.e. I have the code almost
> working as a standalone command, but I guess the best integration method
> could be having a new scep directory within the crypto one and the
> scep.c in the apps directory) and where to put the code ?
Separating the code into library functions and the command line utility
sounds good. This way the functions could be used by other applications
linking against libcrypto.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
