> > Options:
> >
> > 1. Move *-elf.[os] one level up, e.g.:
> >
> > dx86-elf.s:   asm/des-586.pl ../perlasm/x86asm.pl ../perlasm/cbc.pl
> >       (cd asm; $(PERL) des-586.pl elf $(CFLAGS) > ../dx86-elf.s)
> 
> This option didn't work out very well.
> ...
> making all in crypto/md5...
>         cc -c -DOPENSSL_NO_DYNAMIC_ENGINE -DOPENSSL_THREADS -Kthread -DOPENSSL_N
> O_KRB5 -O -DFILIO_H -Kpentium -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -o mx86-elf.o mx
> 86-elf.s
> UX:cc: ERROR: -o would overwrite mx86-elf.o

Duh? It's not plain lame, it's pathetic!

> > 3. Put the suggested rule into every Makefile.ssl.
>                                  ^^^^^
> Only 9 of them (so far)

... and it's 8 too much:-)

> I you REALLY don't like #3, just leave assembler support out
> of UnixWare 2.x as it is quit old.

And so we'll do!

> The existing rules (in HEAD) work fine for UnixWare 7.x, OpenUNIX 8.0.0,
> & SCO Open Server 5 (current shipping products)

Great! Next and final question is why unixware-7, unixware-7-pentium,
unixware-7-pentium_pro, etc.? The point being is that ./config uses
unixware-7 *only* and I figure that those users who are smart enough to
'./Configure unixware-7-pentium' can as well run './Configure unixware-7
-Kpentium'.

A.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to