> 1)Unless I understood you correctly, could you please send me > the complete implementation for aix-shared which you want.
You have to understand that I don't have access to AIX machine and therefore can't be completely sure what I actually want. What I asked in previous letter is to run the command *manually* without modifying Makefile.ssl. I asked you to make an effort to make it work. E.g. if it complains like you report, I'd appreciate if you could read reference manuals and figure out how to work around the problem. I mean we should find working command first, modifying Makefile is easy. > 2)On AIX modulenames contain *.so.0.9.7 as well as on other platforms. > However, it is easy to change Makefile so that they were named just *.so > which I did. ??? Makefile.org in 0.9.7 says -o lib$$i.so, i.e. no .0.9.7 is appended. Two sentences above don't make any sense to me, unless you asked us to change it earlier, before 0.9.7 release that is. Please clarify. > It is then possible to check version compatibility > for libcrypto.so & libssl.so. What do you mean by "check version compatibility?" If you mean check binary compatibility between libcrypto.so[.0.9.6] and libcrypto.so[.0.9.7], then the answer is already known and it's "they are not binary compatible." Period. If you mean something else, clarify. > As I said, shared libraries for versions 0.9.6 > and 0.9.7 seem to be compatible on solaris and linux but not on AIX. If they appear working with your application, then it's just pure luck. Interchanging 0.9.6 and 0.9.7 is not supported and you should give up the idea immediately (or forget about support:-). A. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
