Hello Richard,
> Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > > It's unfortunate that cryptoki.h is GPLd, or I would put it in our contribution area. > > GPL is not compatible with the OpenSSL license. Is it possible to get a different cryptoki.h? I got the original cryptoki.h which is not GPLd from RSA and is a sample for Windows environment. I have added necessary changes for Unix-like platforms. > Also, is conf.h really necssary? You're absolutely right, conf.h is not necessary. I take it off. > I'm willing to do the transformation needed for this bundle to work properly within OpenSSL. So, you can find attached to this mail updates taking in account your advice. Cheers, Afchine Madjlessi ______________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bull TrustWay R&D, France http://www.servers.bull.com/trustway ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
