In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:06:55 +0300,
Solar Designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
solar> --- openssl-0.9.6h/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c Thu Nov 28 11:06:30 2002
solar> +++ openssl-0.9.6i/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c Tue Dec 10 11:28:16 2002
solar> @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@
solar> ctx->chain=NULL;
solar> }
solar> CRYPTO_free_ex_data(x509_store_ctx_method,ctx,&(ctx->ex_data));
solar> - OPENSSL_cleanse(&ctx->ex_data,sizeof(CRYPTO_EX_DATA));
solar> + memset(&ctx->ex_data,0,sizeof(CRYPTO_EX_DATA));
solar> }
solar>
solar> Is this change intentional, it appears to undo the change introduced
solar> between 0.9.6g and 0.9.6h?
Yes. ex_data is a pointer, need I say more? :-)
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
