In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 22 Feb 2003 23:19:49 +0100 (CET), "Ulf Moeller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Why? mklink.pl will test if symlink is possible, and if not, it will do a copy instead... ulf> Log: ulf> Copy rather than symlink the test data. ulf> This is needed because Windows doesn't support symlinks. ulf> ulf> The Cygwin/MinGW build now passes "make test". ulf> ulf> Summary: ulf> Revision Changes Path ulf> 1.75 +1 -1 openssl/crypto/evp/Makefile.ssl ulf> ____________________________________________________________________________ ulf> ulf> patch -p0 <<'@@ .' ulf> Index: openssl/crypto/evp/Makefile.ssl ulf> ============================================================================ ulf> $ cvs diff -u -r1.74 -r1.75 Makefile.ssl ulf> --- openssl/crypto/evp/Makefile.ssl 6 Feb 2003 19:25:11 -0000 1.74 ulf> +++ openssl/crypto/evp/Makefile.ssl 22 Feb 2003 22:19:48 -0000 1.75 ulf> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ ulf> @$(TOP)/util/point.sh Makefile.ssl Makefile ulf> @$(PERL) $(TOP)/util/mklink.pl ../../include/openssl $(EXHEADER) ulf> @$(PERL) $(TOP)/util/mklink.pl ../../test $(TEST) ulf> - @$(PERL) $(TOP)/util/mklink.pl ../../test $(TESTDATA) ulf> + cp $(TESTDATA) ../../test ulf> @$(PERL) $(TOP)/util/mklink.pl ../../apps $(APPS) ulf> ulf> install: ulf> @@ . ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
